Civil Services Prep

Prelims 2013 · Modern History and the Freedom Struggle · Question 89

The people of India agitated against the arrival of Simon Commission because

  1. Indians never wanted the review of the working of the Act of 1919
  2. Simon Commission recommended the abolition of Dyarchy (Diarchy) in the Provinces
  3. There was no Indian member in the Simon Commission
  4. The Simon Commission suggested the partition of the country

Answer

There was no Indian member in the Simon Commission

  • (a) Incorrect. Indians did not oppose a review of the 1919 Act as such; they opposed the manner in which the Commission was constituted.
  • (b) Incorrect. The agitation began on the Commission’s arrival in 1928, before its recommendations were known; abolition of dyarchy in provinces was a later recommendation.
  • (c) Correct. The Simon Commission had no Indian member; it was an all-British body, which triggered the slogan “Simon Go Back.”
  • (d) Incorrect. The Commission did not suggest partition of India; partition became an issue much later in a different political context.
  1. Consider the following statements : I. Pali texts contain the first definite references to coins, e.g.,…
  2. Consider the following statements relating to the use of the place-value system in India : 1. The earliest…
  3. Consider the following statements about the archaeological findings in Harappan towns : I. There is wide…
  4. Which one of the following statements about the Eka Movement and Bardoli Satyagraha is correct ?
  5. Consider the following statements about the Rigvedic period : I. Irrigation from wells allowed agriculture to…
  6. Which of the following pairs of the king and his dynasty in early historical Tamilakam is/are **not**…